The Discovery Update – September 2013

/
01Sep2013

The Discovery Update – September 2013

  • atkinsonbaker
  • 1 Tags
  • Comments

September 2013

From the President

We continue to strive to ensure that our services are of the highest quality because we know you have a choice when it comes to court reporting services.

Our goal for this e-newsletter is to provide you with useful discovery information and tools because we take a genuine interest in the legal community beyond just court reporting.

We hope you find this issue useful, and we encourage you to send us information that has helped you in your practice and that you think will benefit our readers.

Best regards,
Sheila Atkinson-Baker

Proposed Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Amendments

By Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, D.C.

Since their introduction 75 years ago, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have embodied a policy of “broad and liberal” discovery, and state court procedures generally have followed suit. In the last two decades, the universal adoption of electronic mail for business communications and the decreasing cost of electronic storage have dramatically increased the cost of litigation, as liberal discovery has required extensive and expensive efforts to collect and review documents.

Responding to this growing burden, the body charged with overseeing the development of the Federal Rules, the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, is proposing to amend the Federal Rules to impose important new limitations on discovery in federal civil litigation.

Read Full Article >>

Know When to Pursue Witness Inconsistency and When to Let it Go

By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm

If you’ve spent any time in civil courtrooms, you’ve seen it before. The witness in the box fudges an answer and says something that differs a bit from their deposition, and the solemn ritual of impeachment begins. With great fanfare, the official copy of the deposition is unsealed. Do you remember having your deposition taken? Do you remember a court reporter being present? And you were sworn to tell the truth? And you did tell the truth? Did I ask you…? And did you answer…?  After all of this buildup, the jury is now on the edge of their seats, expecting the next question to bring a full-on Perry Mason style breakdown on the stand with the fact witness now confessing to murder. What more commonly happens in an actual civil trial impeachment, however, can be a little less dramatic: a momentary difference in a timeline description, an altered recollection of one fact among many, or a somewhat higher or lower degree of certainty than was earlier conveyed.

Read Full Article >>

side1
PROPOSED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS

KNOW WHEN TO PURSUE WITNESS INCONSISTENCY AND WHEN TO LET IT GO

BEWARE THE WORDS THAT MIGHT BE STUFFED IN YOUR DEPONENT’S MOUTH

 


WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED

E-Discovery Rules Applied to Social Media

Cloud Computing Complicates E-Discovery Issues

side2
Beware The Words That Might  Be Stuffed In Your Deponent’s Mouth
Read Article >>
side3
Tips: E-Discovery on Macs and Other Apple Products
Read it
side4

HEAD SCRATCHER

I went into the woods and got it. I sat down to seek it.

I brought it home with me because I couldn’t find it.

What is it?

Email us the right answer and you could be randomly drawn as the winner of a $25 gift card!

Last month’s answer