The Discovery Update – January 2016

/
19Jan2016

The Discovery Update – January 2016

  • Sheila Atkinson-Baker
  • 1 Tags
  • Comments

From the President

With the beginning of each new year, we focus on improving our services and changing existing structures to better give you what you need.

Year after year, we continue to strive in what has become a very competitive market in the legal industry. To help us ensure we are providing you with what you need, please let us know what we can do to improve. Your feedback will help us meet our goal to serve you in the best possible way.

We sincerely value our relationship with you, we wish you the best in 2016, and we hope you and your firm continue to prosper and grow throughout the year.

Best regards,
Sheila Atkinson-Baker

 

Databases in Discovery

By Craig Ball

Five years ago, I wrote The Luddite Litigator’s Guide to Databases in E-Discovery to accompany a lecture on the subject at the 2010 Georgetown Advanced E-Discovery Institute.  When I went looking for source material for the article, I was struck by how little there was.  Databases hold most of what we seek in discovery; yet, no one had written anything practical about discovering structured data.  My Luddite Litigator’s Guide was a start but far from a comprehensive treatment, as it lacked the takeaway lawyers crave most: exemplar language and forms.

The curse of legal writing is that we are less prone to create than emulate.  We borrow language from forms as though it were enchanted incantations.  In fact, there are precious few magic words that must appear in pleadings and discovery requests, a point made often and expertly by Bryan Garner, whose thoughtful work I commend to you as a path to better legal writing.

Read full article

 

Print Screen for Social Media Evidence: Not Defensible and Also Very Expensive

By John Patzakis

As we often note on this blog, courts continue to routinely find that the testimony of an individual who merely printed a copy of a social media webpage is insufficient to authenticate social media evidence. Notable recent cases with such rulings include Linscheid v. Natus Medical Inc., 2015 WL 1470122, at *5-6 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2015) (finding LinkedIn profile page not authenticated by declaration from individual who printed the page from the Internet); Monet v. Bank of America, N.A., 2015 WL 1775219, at *8 (Cal Ct. App. Apr. 16, 2015) (memorandum by an unnamed person about representations others made on Facebook is at least double hearsay” and not authenticated), and Moroccanoil vs. Marc Anthony Cosmetics, 57 F.Supp.3d 1203 (2014) (Facebook screenshots inadmissible in a trademark infringement without supporting circumstantial information).

Read full article

side1

DATABASES IN DISCOVERY

PRINT SCREEN FOR SOCIAL MEDIA EVIDENCE: NOT DEFENSIBLE AND ALSO VERY EXPENSIVE

AN OPEN LOOK AT KEYWORD SEARCH VS. PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS

WHY IN-HOUSE COUNSEL MUST BE INVOLVED IN DECISIONS ABOUT CLOUD COMPUTING

WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED

Nitty Gritty Discovery Requests

Calm Your Clients’ Jitters About Their Deposition

side2

An Open Look at Keyword Search vs. Predictive Analytics
Read it »

Why In-House Counsel Must be Involved in Decisions About Cloud Computing
Read it »

side3

Timely Technology Competence Tips for the Non-Technological Lawyer
Read it »

Exporting a Multipage TIFF from Acrobat
Read it »

side4

HEAD SCRATCHER

My eye is dark, and my mane is yellow.  You may see me at the mart, and I’m probably taller than you, fellow.

What am I?

Email us the right answer and you could be randomly drawn as the winner of a $25 gift card!

Last month’s answer